Patrick Daciek vs Andres Alvarez Cerdan Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L W L L L W L
Form
L L W W W L W W L LHead-2-Head: Daciek 1 - 0 Cerdan
They have played 2 sets in total, with Daciek winning 2 and Cerdan winning 0. The last match between Daciek and Cerdan was at the USA F20, 22-06-2016, First, Clay with Patrick Daciek getting the victory 6-1 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Patrick Daciek | 1 |
| Andres Alvarez Cerdan | 0 |
USA F20(22-06-2016)
6
1
6
4
| Daciek | Stats | Cerdan |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| Highest Rank | N/A | |
| 35 | Age | 30 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 56% (162-129) | Career Total W/L | 49% (51-54) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Rybakina VS Svitolina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Korda VS Ruud PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-4 |
Stats 
Patrick Daciek
Player
Andres Alvarez Cerdan
79%
(
42 of
53)
1st Serve %
41%
(
23 of
56)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 1:7:0 | Average Match Time | 1:7:0 |
| 79% (42/53) | 1st Serve % | 41% (23/56) |
| 62% (26/42) | 1st Serve Win % | 52% (12/23) |
| 55% (6/11) | 2nd Serve Win % | 36% (12/33) |
| 55% (6/11) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (2/5) |
| 57% (32/56) | Return Points Win % | 40% (21/53) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Patrick Daciek Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 1-6 10-6 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 3-6 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-7 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
view more
Andres Alvarez Cerdan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Adam El Mihdawy
Player
Andres Alvarez Cerdan
52%
(
22 of
42)
1st Serve %
43%
(
30 of
70)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
77%
(
17 of
22)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
14 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
70)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Patrick Daciek
Player
Andres Alvarez Cerdan
79%
(
42 of
53)
1st Serve %
41%
(
23 of
56)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-7(5) 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Zeballos
Player
Andres Alvarez Cerdan
52%
(
28 of
54)
1st Serve %
49%
(
26 of
53)
4
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56% (162/129) | Win/Loss | 49% (51/54) |
| 55% (357/290) | Sets Win/Loss | 47% (104/115) |
| 53% (2966/2620) | Games Win/Loss | 50% (946/948) |
| 48% (35/38) | Hard Win/Loss | 47% (36/40) |
| 58% (118/84) | Clay Win/Loss | 54% (15/13) |
| 56% (9/7) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.03 | Aces Per Game | 0.04 |
| 92 | Aces Total | 41 |
| 0.09 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.06 |
| 234 | Total Double Faults | 54 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 318.74 | Average Opponent Rank | 271.97 |
| 64% (3125/4867) | 1st Serve % | 49% (461/944) |
| 59% (1835/3125) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (286/461) |
| 45% (788/1741) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (213/483) |
| 40% (209/528) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (36/96) |
| 41% (1950/4736) | Return Points Win % | 38% (340/888) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/2) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 42% (8/11) | Challenger W/L | 29% (2/5) |
| 57% (154/116) | Futures W/L | 50% (49/49) |
| 56% (160/288) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 49% (50/103) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 51% (23/45) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 44% (4/9) |
| 48% (31/64) | Deciding Set Win % | 64% (7/11) |
| 88% (172/151) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 96% (48/46) |
| 12% (172/21) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 4% (48/2) |
| 9% (119/11) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 7% (57/4) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
